![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Webb wrote:
How can you tell whether you are straight and level? If you're in a balanced turn, your accelerometer (which actually measures net force) will believe you are straight and level. And a GPS won't help much at all, mostly because its response rate is too slow. Frank As I see it, accelerometers and GPS together are all that's needed. If the vectors from all 3 accelerometers are in the right direction, and the average GPS heading is not moving much- you're straight and level. My GPS updates about once per second. That's plenty fast enough.Once every 10 seconds would work.When flying, do you react to every bounce, or just ride with the flow and provide general guidance? I don't know about you, but I try to stay relaxed. The GPS does too make the differance between a really sticky problem and a slam dunk. I'm betting your practical experience was before $50 GPS and $3 accelerometers? (say, 5 years ago). Am I right? Nope... I finished on my MTech thesis the year before last, designing a system to automatically measure ocean waves. I used the ADXL202 accelerometers you've mentioned here, plus 3 magnetometers to measure attitude, plus some digital filtering and stuff. Ocean waves, being in constant variable motion, is probably a tougher environment than an aircraft. And, as someone else suggested, I guess that an aircraft system could be designed as a pilot aid rather than pilot replacement. Your GPS can't tell you whether you're straight and level, only whether you're straight. Whilst we're talking GPS, some interesting work was done using GPS to measure attitude using 3 antennas about a foot apart. This sounded like it had real promise. Maybe we have bumpier bumps here, or maybe you fly something with a high wing loading, or whatever, but in the circumstances where an active wing leveler would be useful, I think it would need to react accurately and correctly within (say) 0.1 seconds to be useful. And would need to not need to be reset more than (say) once in 20 minutes. I just can't see that with a 1-second GPS update of position and track (not airspeed or heading). If there's no bumps, then manual aileron trim will do the trick just as well. Frank |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ANG Woman Wing Commander Doesn't See Herself as Pioneer, By Master Sgt. Bob Haskell | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 18th 04 08:40 PM |
Wing tip stalls | mat Redsell | Soaring | 5 | March 13th 04 05:07 PM |
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | September 29th 03 03:40 PM |
Can someone explain wing loading? | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 4 | September 10th 03 02:33 AM |
An Affordable Homebrue 60 in DS machine | Grant | Soaring | 0 | August 8th 03 03:52 AM |