![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"lowflyer" wrote in message
... Your answer points out why a lot of us still need anti-spyware. I for one wouldn't have the confidence to do whatever you are describing. I am not doubting you; I just don't have the know-how to agree, disagree, or follow your directions. But I am able to download anti-spyware :-) Well, the "special handling" I mentioned is really just one-time stuff. If you don't have the expertise to do them, then you likely have someone in your life (either friendly or paid) who takes care of system administration stuff like that. The solution would be to just have them do the "special handling" for you, in the instances it shows up. Nevertheless, my main question was with respect to what PC World wrote about. Regardless of what's practical, locking down the system is a nearly 100% solution for preventing spyway from being installed in the first place, and is much more effective than even the best anti-spyware software out there. PC World should have at least mentioned that, even if they do agree with you that using the built-in security features is impractical. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|