![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know a few who are old & bold.
I think it should be treated as any other aerobatic manouver. People should be taught how to do it safely. Aerobatics are unecessary & dangerous. Should we ban them? Nick. wrote in message oups.com... I guess the older we get the less "fun" we want to have, remember. There are old pilots and bold pilots but no old and bold pilots. Nick Gilbert wrote: I think the idea is that you have a good idea what is going on in the pattern before you finish. In most (all?) contests, the last leg of a task *should* guarantee that all competitors are coming from the same direction, therefore you have had 10/20/30/40+ miles with the same aircraft heading for the finish. In Australia we have had several midairs over the years, some with tragic consequences, but I dont know of any that have occured at the finish line. They all occur on task (generally in a thermal) where at least one of the 1 pilots would have had a good view of the other sailplane. When we fly, we are all placing our life in the hands of other pilots. I Agree that low, high speed finishes are not necessary. But they are FUN! They are fun for the pilot, and fun for those on the ground. In fact, when you think about it, they are really the only fun thing to see for the people on the ground. They are also the only part of the sport with any marketing potential. Non-pilots are not interested in seeing your new C302, PDA or Winglets. They want action. Have a look at the interest the UKSmokin video has generated. Watch it with non-gliding friends that have never seen a glider before. See the look on their faces. Nick. wrote in message oups.com... We successfully fly our sailplanes by keeping our options open, don't we? We keep an extra 300 feet in the pattern, just in case we hit a bunch of sink, don't we? On the ridge we keep our speed up and always have an escape route, don't we? Why then, do we continue to use a finish gate that reduces our options to just one? When we finish at 50 feet we must immediately exchange our speed for altitude and hope there isn't somebody above us as we make a beautiful climbing turn to down-wind. What if we suddenly see someone else in the pattern? What if we see 3 other ships in the pattern? Been there, done that! I abandoned any thought of putting it on the runway and lined up on the taxiway, just to see one of the other ships make the same decision and cut inside me. We rolled to a stop, not 15 feet apart. Over the years I have paid my competitive dues by volunteering to run contests. I have been the Competition Director in 3 Nationals and a Regionals in the last 30 years. I will not subject myself, the pilots or the organization to the liability involved in using a finish gate that I consider outmoded, unnecessary and unsafe. We have an option, don't we? JJ Sinclair |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 AM |
Lycoming O-290-D options | Gene Z. Ragan | Home Built | 6 | March 11th 04 10:17 AM |
New Army Aviation Options? | Thomas Schoene | Military Aviation | 22 | February 29th 04 09:51 PM |
Options in Summer of '45 | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 0 | December 24th 03 04:15 PM |
Small Blue Planet Toys goes Postal !! Economy Shipping Options now availalble | Small Blue Planet Toys | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 11th 03 04:00 PM |