![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have been thinking about selling my pa28-235 for some time, but I dread the process. I understand why a buyer inexperienced with the model would want a prebuy inspection, and I respect that. But until I have a check in my hand, the plane is still mine and I am going to treat it as such. Buyers need to respect that. Snip I'll be happy to remove the inspection panels and take off the cowl, and he can come LOOK at it in MY hanger. If desired, he can have a mechanic of his choice come and LOOK at it in my hangar. But while the plane is still mine, it is not going to the buyer's shop or being touched by the buyer's mechanic. It's all a matter of degree. In Jack's case, the plane in question had NOT complied with Service Bulletin 1006 (or at least I couldn't see it in the logbooks) -- the "Big One" that addresses wing spar corrosion. I'm assuming that Jack would have wisely required that this SB be complied with, and the spar be checked, before or at the pre-buy. This, of course, means removing the gas tanks -- a MAJOR operation on a Cherokee -- pulling them forward and inspecting the spar. To comply with the SB, you have to paint the spar with anti-corrosion goop, and you might as well replace all the (probably original) fuel lines while you're at it. None of this is cheap, and there is always the opportunity to break, scratch or dent something in the process. Was this the deal killer? Did the seller find someone dumb enough to buy his plane *without* complying with this service bulletin? Dunno. It's a major operation, and I wouldn't blame the seller for not wanting to do it. On the other hand, any Cherokee that has sat outside for any length of time -- and this one was parked on the ramp for a decade of Illinois winters -- must comply with that SB, or (IMHO) it is a completely unsellable aircraft. So, Jack's search continues. Maybe you should sell him your 235, and solve *everyone's* problems! :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
430/530 Back Course Question... | Bill Hale | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | February 12th 04 05:04 AM |
Memories come flying back for ex-air corpsmen | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 10th 03 08:56 PM |
The Little Wheel in Back | Veeduber | Home Built | 6 | September 8th 03 10:29 AM |
Localizer Back Course vs. ILS | ilsub | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 25th 03 04:04 PM |
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap | tim liverance | Military Aviation | 0 | August 18th 03 12:18 AM |