![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
The whole point of profiling is to detain people based on surface similarities to the group you are targeting, hoping that you'll snag someone. We may have a disconnect here. I think you are talking about one possible action you might take based on a profile match. What I have seen proposed is *not* asking the extra questions, taking a second look at paperwork, etc. of those people who clearly *do not* match the profile. Profiling does *not* mean arresting everyone in a given group (at least in the USA). We ban pocket knives on airplanes. Terrorists will find it harder (but not impossible) to use a pocket knife to carry out their plan. ... ...Perhaps we should outlaw sharp pencils, and only allow people to do their work using lipstick. Work quality might improve ![]() serves only to reduce collateral damage to the passengers. With the replacement of cockpit doors and the change in pilot procedures, the erstwhile terrorist can freely saw away at the cockpit door all day long. The pilot will simply land the plane and let a SWAT team deal with the problem. We may lose a few passengers to sharp pencils but at least we keep the airplane out of buildings. While I'm not advocating shootouts at thirty thousand feet, it's only half in jest that I submit an alternate plan: everyone who boards an aircraft is issued a gun, and if he hasn't used it by the end of the flight, he has to explain why. I agree. Stats clearly show violent crime rates going down whenever gun laws are relaxed. Shoot (pun intended), I don't think you would have to issue guns; I'd be happy to bring my own ![]() Sadly, this is impractical since jittery, untrained passengers would probably spend more ammo shooting each other than the very occasional terrorists anyway ![]() If we are just trying to prevent bank robbery in general, the fact that two white males robbed a bank once is of little consequence. Except that in the case of terrorists we have long lists of them that are in the country using fake ID. Seems like a good idea to look for them. The point of profiling is not to arrest everyone in a given profile but rather to not waste time on extra questions and paperwork checks for those who do not meet the profile. The DC TFR is an abuse of authority which accomplishes nothing. I don't like it either but if you have ever launched to the North from DCA you can see that its not practical to shoot down an attacking aircraft before it nails the capital or white house. There does not seem to be a good solution for this. Airlines are clearly the biggest tank of jet fuel but if a PC-12 loaded with TNT make it to the Mall I don't think people would be happy with that either. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 04 04:02 PM |
ENHANCED AVIATION SECURITY PACKAGE ANNOUNCED (All "General Aviation Pilots" to Pay $200.00 every two years!) | www.agacf.org | Piloting | 4 | December 21st 03 09:08 PM |
Aviation is too expensive | Chris W | Piloting | 71 | August 21st 03 11:54 AM |