![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
: Which FAA? Every FSDO is a fiefdom unto itself.
Sadly, yes... that's pretty much what I meant. It's dependent on your particular FSDO. : Would that include a T&B? How about a voltmeter? A radio? Post : lights? Yes, I should say so. The only reason not to would be replacing a part with an equivalent part. If your T&B dies, you can legally replace it with an equivalent part without a field approval. A more electrically-oriented example would be if you wanted to add an ammeter to your voltmeter-equipped plane vs. adding a voltmeter to your ammeter-equipped plane. In the former, you need to sever the charging wire and put in either the meter or a shunt for the meter. In the latter you only need a negligible-current wire to run to a voltmeter. I would argue that the latter is a minor alteration, but the former is much more significant. I'm sure the regs don't have any way to distinguish between issues that subtle. : In some FSDO's, you're right - it's considered major. In some FSDO's : it's not. The real issue is that unless you bring it to the attention : of the FSDO, how are they going to know? You simply need to get it : past your IA at annual time. : Some IA's will ignore it even without paperwork. Most will accept an : A&P's signature and not question his determination that it was minor. : And a few assholes will actually ground your plane and make you either : pay to have it removed or get the FAA involved. A 337 doesn't save you : from this - remember how Honeck had to remove his strobes, installed : under a 337, because the IA decided they weren't legal and got the FAA : involved? True. Just shows how broken the whole system is. My question is what in the *HELL* is a "signoff" by a certified IA good for if the next IA and everyone thereafter is responsible for it too? It only serves to hold last guy accountable for everything. What's the purpose of a certification for an IA if the next IA can't trust the previous' work? I don't recall Jay getting phucked having to remove strobes. That sounds like it was an ugly FAA-ism. : That's why it's important to choose your shop carefully. Again, I call bull**** on this. Unfortunately, it's true. -Cory ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss * * Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PDA GPS power issues (i.trek Mouse) | Mark Morissette | Owning | 8 | March 24th 05 02:14 PM |
Power management on a O-300 | Victor | Piloting | 0 | July 9th 04 01:09 AM |
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! | Bill Berle | Owning | 92 | June 26th 04 03:24 PM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Piloting | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
Aircraft engine certification FAR's | Corky Scott | Home Built | 4 | July 25th 03 06:46 PM |