A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

12v power port for older Cessna



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old March 18th 05, 07:57 PM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
A more electrically-oriented example would be if you
wanted to add an ammeter to your voltmeter-equipped plane vs. adding

a voltmeter to
your ammeter-equipped plane. In the former, you need to sever the

charging wire and
put in either the meter or a shunt for the meter. In the latter you

only need a
negligible-current wire to run to a voltmeter. I would argue that

the latter is a
minor alteration, but the former is much more significant. I'm sure

the regs don't
have any way to distinguish between issues that subtle.


No, the regs don't. People do. There is such a thing as judgment. An
A&P is supposed to be able to make a judgment call with respect to what
constitutes a major vs. minor alteration, within certain guidelines.
The guidelines give a fair amount of latitude. In many FSDO's, the
poliy is to make that latitude go away by dramatically restricting what
is allowed as a minor alteration.

Just shows how broken the whole system is.


Well, yes. That's why I don't think it's useful to discuss what the
rules actually are and what constitutes compliance - because it changes
from FSDO to FSDO, and from inspector to inspector, and if an inspector
wants to hang you he will find a way. The only useful things to
discuss are (a) what is actually reasonably safe and (b) what you can
get away with in terms of inspections.

In general, the only reason you need an annual is in the event of an
accident, and then only for insurance purposes. You might argue that
you need it to be 'legal' but that's a false argument. No plane is
ever legal. Any plane can be grounded. Therefore, you're really no
more legal with an annual than without. Unless the plane looks like
crap or has obviously non-aviation stuff installed, a ramp check will
not catch an out-of-annual aircraft - not that ramp checks are common.

I don't recall Jay getting phucked having to remove strobes. That

sounds like
it was an ugly FAA-ism.


No. It was a bad shop. The IA had the option of letting the 337
stand, and nobody would have questioned it. For decades, nobody had.
I believe those strobes are still in a shoebox.

Michael

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PDA GPS power issues (i.trek Mouse) Mark Morissette Owning 8 March 24th 05 02:14 PM
Power management on a O-300 Victor Piloting 0 July 9th 04 01:09 AM
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! Bill Berle Owning 92 June 26th 04 03:24 PM
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! Enea Grande Piloting 1 November 4th 03 12:57 AM
Aircraft engine certification FAR's Corky Scott Home Built 4 July 25th 03 06:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.