![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Colin W Kingsbury wrote: Up here in Taxachusetts there's a long-standing feud over tolls on the Massachusetts Turnpike. The law that authorized the bond issue to build the pike said, tolls will be charged until the bonds are paid off, then the tolls shall end. Well, the bonds were paid off more than 10 years ago, but the tollbooths persist. A couple years back when the debate flared up, the tollbooth defenders said, "well, if we quit collecting tolls, the state will need to come up with that $200 million some other way." Funny part is, the accountants opened the books and figured that staffing and maintaining the tollbooths cost the state about 60 cents on every dollar of tolls they collected. So the net cost to the state of shutting down the tolls would be only $80 million. The same thing is going on here in New Jersey, only they figured the cost of collecting the tolls at over 80 cents on the dollar. When you figure in the Federal highway funds that they can't get because the GSP and NJT are toll roads, the State would make a net *profit* by eliminating the toll booths. The problem is that the State set up a bureaucracy decades ago to run the toll roads. This group knows that their jobs and power base disappears if the roads become free, so they are continually borrowing money to "improve" the toll system. These loans could not legally be repaid with Federal highway funds. Four years ago it was "EZPass." The latest effort is to remove half the toll stations in one direction, expand those in the other direction, and double the tolls. The signs say "The inconvenience is temporary -- the improvements permanent." So are the tolls, it seems. George Patterson I prefer Heaven for climate but Hell for company. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Planes at Hanscom face turbulence caused by higher fees | Bill | Piloting | 3 | February 12th 05 04:46 PM |
NAA Fees to the US Team | Doug Jacobs | Soaring | 2 | October 29th 04 01:09 AM |
LXE installation XP, strict user permissions. | Hannes | Soaring | 0 | March 21st 04 11:15 PM |
The Irony of Boeing/Jeppesen Being Charged User Fees! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | January 23rd 04 12:23 PM |
Angel Flight pilots: Ever have an FBO refuse to wave landing fees? | Peter R. | Piloting | 11 | August 2nd 03 01:20 AM |