![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael" wrote in message oups.com... C J Campbell wrote: This comes very close to the category of a non-critical emergency, defined as an emergency where, no matter what you do, you are going to die. That's a hell of a defeatist attitude, and demonstrably wrong since people HAVE survived exactly this situation. Yes, and people have survived jumping out of the plane without a parachute at 20,000 feet, too. But the odds are against it. Personally, I think the way you deal with an electrical failure in IMC with no GPS or handheld radio is that you avoid putting yourself in a situation where that can happen. I would hate to have to rely on a handheld GPS in such an emergency, though of course it would be welcome as better than nothing. Actually, it is DRAMATICALLY better than nothing. It is more accurate, more precise, and more reliable than any NDB and most VOR's. NDB, yes. VOR, highly questionable. The ability to shoot an overlay using a handheld GPS should be part of the repertoire of any instrument pilot. If you don't know how, ask your instructor to show you. I would agree with that. Newer single engine aircraft with glass cockpits have backup instruments and some sort of backup electrical system, even if it is only certified for 30 minutes. That's because they lack vacuum Nonsense. Most of them have backup vacuum instruments and even have dual vacuum pumps, which older airplanes lack. They also have terrain displays so that you have at least a small chance of descending out of the clouds without killing yourself. Terrain displays are available on the newer high-end handheld GPS units. True, mine has that. Beyond that, I would say that you are taking a serious risk if you insist on flying a single engine piston airplane in actual IMC beyond, say, punching through a thin layer. That must be why self-flown business flights, which do this routinely, are so much more dangerous than personal flights, which rarely do this. Oh, wait... In fact, self-flown business flights do not do this routinely, especially in single engine piston aircraft. They are less dangerous than personal flights because the pilots are better trained, the planes are better equipped, and they are not going to kill themselves with low level VFR maneuvers, which is the biggest killer of GA pilots. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TSA requirement of Security Awareness Training | dancingstar | Piloting | 3 | October 5th 04 02:17 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Alternator failure modes (long) | mikem | Owning | 1 | September 21st 03 07:47 PM |