![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, if all you want is to record data, then yeah, whatever you want to use
is just fine as long as you can keep it from interfering with any critical functions on your plane. However, debugging all the potential EMI stuff could be hell just to get things to work. I was being sarcasting about the hacking comment....yeah, it was silly. There are already enough other decent options that will work just fine without the hassles of dealing with radio frequency stuff. Look at the aviation versions of CAN. Well supported, cheap, and really easy. There's also 1394, which is used a bunch in some new aviation systems. "nafod40" wrote in message ... It's coming to aircraft. In fact, it's already there via people that don't turn off their cell phones and laptops etc., just uncontrolled. Good article. http://developer.intel.com/technolog...cles/art_4.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vibration Monitor (Hyde, Wanttaja?) | RST Engineering | Home Built | 71 | April 4th 05 04:44 PM |
Pinging Ron Wanttaja - "Unporting?" | Bob Chilcoat | Home Built | 13 | November 24th 04 07:28 PM |
Vibration Testing | Jim Weir | Home Built | 20 | October 10th 04 07:22 AM |
Vibration Testing | Jim Weir | Owning | 21 | October 10th 04 07:22 AM |
Survey - 3 blade prop conversion- Cockpit vibration, happy or not | Fly | Owning | 20 | June 30th 04 05:32 PM |