![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can someone explain to me why wasn't he granted the clearance into
KIND? Was it because of traffic flow or because of the weather at KIND? According to the decision it was both, but I was unaware that ATC wouldn't grant you a clearance if the destination field was below minimums as a part 91 flight. Obviously you'd still need fuel on board to comply with an alternate minimums, etc. As a part 91 flight he could still attempt to execute the approach if the field was below minimums, while air carrier flights wouldn't have been able to, correct? I'm not asking about the intelligence of doing such things, obviously, but rather the mechanisms for ATC to deny you a clearance. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Looking for a See and Avoid NTSB report | Ace Pilot | Piloting | 2 | June 10th 04 01:01 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
Senator asks Navy for report on pilot | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 17th 03 10:08 PM |