![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for that. I was thinking mostly about flat / falling leaf spins, but
there are some definate "food for thought" in this regard in what you wrote. "nafod40" wrote in message ... Cockpit Colin wrote: One way to think of it (not too scientific) is that adding power just adds more "juice" to the spin. The power vector rotates around, just making the plane do whatever it's doing with that much more vigor. I understand what you're trying to say, but I just can't get a handle on the physics of it ... OK, stream of consciousness here. Ignore any violations of the law(s of physics). A plane in a spin is yawing and rolling simultaneously. It is also at a stalled angle of attack. What happens is that, as the AOA of a wing increases, its drag always increases, but at a certain point its lift decreases (near and past stall speed). So in a spin (to the left) the left wing has a higher angle of attack, due to adding the downward motion of the plane and the relative motion of the spin (steal kid's F-4 model, experiment), than the right. It has higher drag and less lift, and so the plane rolls left and yaws left. You get spin. To break the spin ususally you must break the yaw, which puts both wings back into an equal amount of AOA condition. To break the yaw you need to create a moment. The moment is created typically with rudder, and sometimes helped by tricks with ailerons. The thrust would not help with creating a moment. So what would it do with more thrust? Well, if the nose was pointing down, it'd make the plane fly "heavier" due to a downward component to the thrust. That'd give you more spin. As for the thought of having the thrust fly you away, if you watch how fast planes spin, versus how fast they accelerate on takeoff with full blower, you'd see that before it'd have chance to accelerate in one direction it'd be pointing another, so to speak. Mathematically speaking, say you wanted the plane to fly away to the east. Integrate the component of thrust that points east over a half-rotation of spin (less than a second?) and divide that by the mass of the plane to get a delta velocity eastward over the half-rotation. Or something like that. Small number which is immediately cancelled by other half-rotation. A plane in a spin carves a slightly spiral trajectory. It'd make the spiral a wee bit bigger. Not enough to matter. That's my story (based on 200+ inverted spins in a Buckeye...thought processes cloudy now), and I'm sticking to it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFI without commercial? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 75 | December 8th 10 04:17 PM |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |