![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron Wanttaja" wrote ...
As far as I know, "public use" aircraft (and their pilots) are exempt from the FAA requirements. Agency *policy* may require pilots and aircraft to hold appropriate FAA documents, but policies can be altered. Back when the Shuttle was first launched, I seem to recall something about the FAA ruling that it had no jurisdiction in such a case...basically, transitory use of the airspace. NOTAM it, and they were satisfied. But who knows.... Ron, You're right about public use aircraft, the Forest Service issues its own pilot licences though all of our company's pilots also had FAA certificates. That wasn't true for all companies. The Forest Service also inspected all of our aircraft and ALL FARs were optional. That's NOT a good thing when it comes to duty times and crew rest. That made for some really miserable days and nights. The Marshal Service, on the other hand, required FAA certificates but understood the sensitive nature of our passengers sometimes required some deviation from the rules. If you think the Shuttle isn't a military craft, you should try and dig out the spec mission that sized the payload bay. Rich |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |
Oshkosh 2003 Redux | Montblack | Owning | 86 | August 14th 03 04:29 PM |
Oshkosh 2003 Redux | Montblack | Piloting | 62 | August 14th 03 04:29 PM |
CQ Oshkosh, CQ Oshkosh | Warren & Nancy | Home Built | 4 | July 3rd 03 06:42 PM |
CQ Oshkosh, CQ Oshkosh | Warren & Nancy | Piloting | 4 | July 3rd 03 06:42 PM |