![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank van der Hulst" wrote in message ... First thing would be Bluetooth headsets... no more cords tangling round the cockpit. That would be pretty nice. But now you need batteries in your headset to power the audio amp. Next would be various engine instruments... EGT, CHT, etc. I guess you'd need some devices (i.e. wires) for routing the signal through the firewall or around it. How much lighter would this be than, say, a twisted pair for CAN? Maybe move the entire radio receiver out to a wingtip or somewhere well away from the engine's RF noise. But I can't see that being self-powered. The receiver could be, but not the transmitter. An antenna wire is probably a lot lighter than running power out, so I guess that would need to stay in the cockpit. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wierd vibration -- Prop or engine, balance or not??? | Chuck | Owning | 17 | December 1st 04 02:12 PM |
Pinging Ron Wanttaja - "Unporting?" | Bob Chilcoat | Home Built | 13 | November 24th 04 07:28 PM |
Vibration Testing | Jim Weir | Home Built | 20 | October 10th 04 07:22 AM |
Vibration Testing | Jim Weir | Owning | 21 | October 10th 04 07:22 AM |
Survey - 3 blade prop conversion- Cockpit vibration, happy or not | Fly | Owning | 20 | June 30th 04 05:32 PM |