![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-04-05 17:41:55 -0400, "Helowriter" said:
1.Apaches did very, very well in the fight for Baghdad and elsewhere in OIF. And those people were using more than spitballs. Yep, same as the Afghans (couldn't throw a rock -- an item in which that nation abounds, if only there was a market they'd be rich as Saudis, and they're much nicer chaps when they're not shooting at you -- without hitting 14.5 or [gulp] 23mm AA. And 12.7s were literally more common than pencils. Their marksmanship was fortunately horrible, ignorance of or absence of sights helped there. But if one of them got lucky and lit a copter up it was generally time to find a nice place to park, even in an Apache. The idea that the Apache is armored well enough to go toe to toe with AA guns was embedded in Army doctrine. I think that fallacy (which the WWI aviators, and the WWII fighter-bombers, and the Vietnam guys all had to relearn) been kicked out of bed. Nothing like losing a dozen airframes in one go, even if they do make it back to base with holes the size of your fist in MR transmissions and whatnot. 2. You're right - that sounds like B.S. A foreign competition pulled the same stunt requiring a cargo container just longer than the basic H-92 cabin I have to relook the cabin size thing, I want to be certain I have the relative sizes of the NH90, S-92 and EH101 straight (from smallest to largest) but Sikorsky was told that by the Navy -- something that would not fit their helicopter needed to go on, and "sorry old boy, for putting you through this." And Sikorsky decided not to appeal. Does that mean they agree? Does that mean that they knew "the fix was in?" These are the kinds of questions where execs who appear forthcoming, change the subject. You can always find an angle with which to rig a contest. I'm just not sure why our military would want to play those games again for the benefit of Agusta Westland. If the PRV competition is rigged, I would hope for a Congressional investigation. Well, one of the requirements is that the a/c air-refuel at 10,000 MSL. Be difficult for any of the contenders to meet that but easiest for the EH101. You could argue that this is a legit requirement. AFSOC lost an HH in Afghanistan doing the daft thing they do over there, refuel while flying through the valleys. At night. Of course, they need to do that because the HH60 has the unrefueled range of a spitball, so on a 150 NM radius run (below average in Afghanistan), you are hitting the tanker twice, once each going and coming. Murphy's law (and the use of stateside HH units for maritime SAR) means that you will be doing this when weather is in **** state. If they're going to do that, they need a Chelton display, not strictly rely on RADALT and FLIR which work OK in rolling terrain but in the mountains, can only tell you you're going to die a couple seconds before you hit. The Chelton displays the terrain from maps in memory. Works even when the FLIR is choking on dust or whatever. And it's TSOd and it's dirt cheap. So naturally the Pentagon, which is only interested in max bennies for legions of uniformed or retired/industry procurement wallahs, is not buying. 3. The HH-60 falls short only in that requirements (and loads) have grown. Gotta disagree with you there. Talk to the pilots and especially the PJs in AFSOC. The ones that never flew the H-3 or H-53 are resigned to the 60, but it always was a mismatch with the mission. A PJ can't properly treat a rescuee, hunched over in the back of the cabin. And on the old Sikorskys (as on all the new contenders except, I believe, the Osprey, which isn't a serious contender for this contract), the pilot can get out of his seat and stretch (or be relieved by a relief pilot). In the 60 he's pretty well stuck for the duration of the mission. Finally, there's that short legs problem that, as I said, literally kills people. The S-70/H-60 is a fantastic helicopter, but not in this job. -- cheers -=K=- Rule #1: Don't hit anything big. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 11 | February 8th 05 02:20 PM |
Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 0 | January 30th 05 03:48 AM |
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 05:24 AM |
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 6 | February 27th 04 09:11 AM |
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot | Badwater Bill | Rotorcraft | 0 | February 25th 04 06:39 PM |