|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
April 11th 05, 12:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com,
"Chuck" wrote: Not always. I was supprised when I ask for a "Pop Up" from Toledo, OH the other day. I ask for a GPS approach and he ask if the plane was IFR GPS equiped and current. I guess because there are so many VFR GPSs. I said yes and that was that. This caught my eye the other day: !FDC 5/2548 FWN FI/T SUSSEX, SUSSEX, NJ. VOR OR GPS-A AMDT 5B... PROCEDURE NA EXCEPT FOR IFR GPS-EQUIPPED AIRCRAFT. I struck me as strange that they felt the need to explicitly state "IFR GPS" for an approach procedure. And, even then, it's badly worded, since there are plenty of IFR GPS units which are not approved for approaches. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
| Radio outage at ZLA grounds flights | A Guy Called Tyketto | Piloting | 0 | September 15th 04 05:56 AM |
| "I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
| FAA to End part 91 Sightseeing flights? | Vaughn | Rotorcraft | 7 | November 2nd 03 01:20 AM |
| Ownership and passengers | Roger Long | Owning | 30 | October 11th 03 02:00 PM |
Threaded Mode