c-170 op/ed?

On 13 Apr 2005 19:52:52 -0700, "houstondan"
wrote:

I own a '54 B model. I use it as a two place airplane (hint: response
to your "is it underpowered" question). I occaisionally will load 3
or 4 people into it if the conditions are right (cool weather + 1/2
tanks or less).

The last 200 lbs towards gross really changes the aircraft's
performance capabilities.

The C-145 is smooth and trouble-free (for me). You must aggressively
lean (on the ground and under low power) and/or use TCP to keep from
fouling the plugs.

If you operate a 170 conservatively (keep the weight down), it's a
fanastic airplane. Dirt cheap to operate, easy to maintain, parts
are no big deal. It's also nice to look at (gotta love that big round
tail).

But the airplane does need more power (what airplane doesn't?).
If I won the lottery, I'd put an 210hp IO-360 in it or perhaps a 220
Franklin.

Bela P. Havasreti

in my ongoing process of falling in love with various aircraft which i
cannot afford (yet!) i come to the cessna 170.

looks like 35-40k$ for a fair example. i think i prefer the no
nosewheel configuration and i'm endorsed to drag so that's ok. i'm
curious about the 6 cylinder 145hp motor. seems like it would be
smooth. does the ac feel underpowered? it looks to me like a utility
172 analog with a little less power for maybe 20-grand less.

opinions/editorials?


dan