![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message . com... Way back in the 30s, some pilots would spin through an overcast and then recover underneath in the clear. Unless the ceiling was 200', that is. Can you imagine? Open cockpit, rain spraying you and there you go into an intentional spin into the merk. Must have had huge balls and tiny brains.... Edgar Bergen was a cousin once removed. I feel like I am talking to a member of the family! Actually those pilots did indeed have a lot of courage, but certainly NOT tiny brains. Just the opposite. Remember, they did NOT have gyro instruments. While it is possible, if you are EXTREMELY careful, to make in instrument letdown through an overcast with only a magnetic compass, a steady foot, good trim and courage it is a lot easier to put the airplane in a stable condition that will lose altitude quickly. Most of those airplanes would pop out of a spin in a quarter turn or less and lose no more than two or three hundred feet while doing it. A spin is STABLE. You cannot dive into the ground at Vne + from a spin. Most of those early airplanes would lose less than 400 feet per turn and the airspeed would never get over about 90 mph while in a spin. An inadvertent spiral is the most likely outcome from trying to fly instruments without any and that will allow the airspeed to build up well over Vne. If you attempt to jerk the airplane out of a high speed spiral when you see ground rapidly approaching you will probably pull the wings off. Prompt recovery from a spin will leave you wings level and only slightly faster than normal cruise airspeed allowing you to find a field and put the darn thing down. Compared to the available alternatives at the time, spinning through the overcast was actually one of the safest options available and actually pretty hard to mess up by sloppy piloting. :-) Letting down with only a magnetic compass is a LOT trickier, albeit possible. Do not practice this alone or in a real overcast! In the northern hemisphere turn to a heading of 180 degrees. Trim the airplane for best glide speed and adjust the throttle for a descent rate not to exceed 500 fpm with 300 probably somewhat safer. Remove you hands from the controls and SIT ON THEM. :-) Carefully, using you feet, nudge the magnetic compass back to the big "S" whenever it begins to stray out of the window. Nudge it gently because it is wiggly as all get out. If your airspeed remains constant, taken care of with the trim only, and you heading does not change, you must be flying straight. If you fly straight and continue a steady and reasonable descent you will descend in a straight course and eventually wind up below the overcast with a controllable descent rate. Of course, if the hilltops extend up into the clouds you may fly into something hard and unyielding before you see the ground below you. Both of these techniques do work. I can attest to that personally, because if they had not, I wouldn't be writing this today. I do not recommend these if you have gyros available. However, I have been trapped where I had to make an "instrument" letdown or climbout when flying in an antique airplane that had no electrical system and no gyros of any kind. Not fun, not real safe, but certainly doable by a properly trained pilot. Highflyer Highflight Aviation Services Pinckneyville Airport ( PJY ) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|