A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

2005 SSA Handicaps Posted



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old April 18th 05, 07:04 PM
nimbusgb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

M B wrote:
As I think about a 24 meter glider, I wonder how much
span is too much?

At some point, the roll rate of a long span must just
be terrible. And there is added wetted area, right?


There are other disadvantages too (assembly, runway
width, etc.) that have nothing to do with flight in
the air too, I suppose.

I can see how lots of span is fine if you are willing
to add enough water, but 24 meters seems like a LOT
of wing.
Once L/D goes beyond a certain point (40 or 50 or whatever)

it seems like updrafts and downdrafts and penetration
become a much better indicator of performance than

strictly L/D.

The pilots who DON'T buy langer spans but have plenty
of money to do so are buying shorter spans for some
reason.
Is it mostly the ground factors, or is there a pretty
'natural' cutoff? Single seat vs. 2-seat I can understand,
and maybe some extra wing for those pilots who are
a bit
heavier, but 24 meters seems REALLY long to me...

At 21:00 15 April 2005, wrote:
no listing for the following

ASW22-A 24meter
ASW22-A 22meter

Al


Mark J. Boyd


25.5 m on my Nimbus 3 and I have never even bothered to fly it in the
22.5 m short mode without the tips on! The roll rate is not 'terrible'
but it does take some getting used too! Unfortunately our field is a
little short so I can't load it to the gills but on anything but a
winters day it really needs a couple of barrels of juice in the wings.

Given enough funds I might go to a HP 304S - 18T. I have always liked
their ships and the 304S looks like another winner and yes ground
rigging is pretty much all of the reason for moving over.

Someone else has already pointed out that longer span changes the way
you fly. There was a comment somewhere about flying the Eta ( 30m span
) 'when in doubt climb in a straight line'. Thats how the big open
ships seem to get around.

The 18m class ships have most of the L/D of the Opens but the reduced
span and modern aerodynamics retain most, if not all of the 15m
maneuverability. In European conditions I doubt whether most open ships
can run away from a new 18m ship. However when it dies late on a good
day its really nice to throttle back to best glide and be able to
average in the 60's for the last 50 or 60km through a sea-breezed final
glide area.


Ian

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mountain Flying Course: Colorado, Apr, Jun, Aug 2005 [email protected] Piloting 0 April 3rd 05 08:48 PM
17 Feb 2005 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 February 17th 05 09:51 PM
International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications 2005 avinash Naval Aviation 0 January 29th 05 10:14 PM
Int. Conf. on Systems Engineering'05 - August 16-18, 2005 avinash Naval Aviation 0 January 29th 05 10:13 PM
CPA 2005 Fly-In Announced Jay Honeck Piloting 4 November 15th 04 03:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.