![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
M B wrote:
As I think about a 24 meter glider, I wonder how much span is too much? At some point, the roll rate of a long span must just be terrible. And there is added wetted area, right? There are other disadvantages too (assembly, runway width, etc.) that have nothing to do with flight in the air too, I suppose. I can see how lots of span is fine if you are willing to add enough water, but 24 meters seems like a LOT of wing. Once L/D goes beyond a certain point (40 or 50 or whatever) it seems like updrafts and downdrafts and penetration become a much better indicator of performance than strictly L/D. The pilots who DON'T buy langer spans but have plenty of money to do so are buying shorter spans for some reason. Is it mostly the ground factors, or is there a pretty 'natural' cutoff? Single seat vs. 2-seat I can understand, and maybe some extra wing for those pilots who are a bit heavier, but 24 meters seems REALLY long to me... At 21:00 15 April 2005, wrote: no listing for the following ASW22-A 24meter ASW22-A 22meter Al Mark J. Boyd 25.5 m on my Nimbus 3 and I have never even bothered to fly it in the 22.5 m short mode without the tips on! The roll rate is not 'terrible' but it does take some getting used too! Unfortunately our field is a little short so I can't load it to the gills but on anything but a winters day it really needs a couple of barrels of juice in the wings. Given enough funds I might go to a HP 304S - 18T. I have always liked their ships and the 304S looks like another winner and yes ground rigging is pretty much all of the reason for moving over. Someone else has already pointed out that longer span changes the way you fly. There was a comment somewhere about flying the Eta ( 30m span ) 'when in doubt climb in a straight line'. Thats how the big open ships seem to get around. The 18m class ships have most of the L/D of the Opens but the reduced span and modern aerodynamics retain most, if not all of the 15m maneuverability. In European conditions I doubt whether most open ships can run away from a new 18m ship. However when it dies late on a good day its really nice to throttle back to best glide and be able to average in the 60's for the last 50 or 60km through a sea-breezed final glide area. Ian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain Flying Course: Colorado, Apr, Jun, Aug 2005 | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | April 3rd 05 08:48 PM |
17 Feb 2005 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 17th 05 09:51 PM |
International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications 2005 | avinash | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 10:14 PM |
Int. Conf. on Systems Engineering'05 - August 16-18, 2005 | avinash | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 10:13 PM |
CPA 2005 Fly-In Announced | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 4 | November 15th 04 03:31 AM |