A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Being asked to "verify direct XXX"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old April 20th 05, 01:31 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Patrick Dirks" wrote in message
news:no-spam-to-pwd-90E9E7.16470019042005@localhost...

FWIW it has been my understanding that ATC cannot legally assign you
"direct" to some fix you cannot navigate to using the equipment suffix
you've filed with; if you file /U or /A you can't be expected to
navigate directly to a fix not defined by VORs.


There is no such restriction.



Of course it is YOUR responsibility to figure out what you can navigate
to, and to tell ATC you're "unable" if ATC tries to clear you somewhere
that would require use of a GPS; a VFR hand-held GPS is irrelevant as
far as "official" navigation is concerned.


For IFR enroute navigation off-airways or beyond normal usable navaid limits
a VFR hand-held GPS is just as relevant as an IFR certified unit.



That said, I've also understood that adding "VFR GPS" in the remarks
might encourage ATC to give assign you a HEADING somewhere, maybe with
"direct when able" or something, on the assumption that with the aid of
your VFR GPS you'll be able to head somewhere with surprising accuracy,
which helps everyone.


You fly a heading with your DG, not your GPS. If you want to proceed direct
somewhere with your handheld GPS then just ask for direct.



You could also ask for "Radar vectors" to somewhere, perhaps as in
"request heading 242 degrees, radar vectors FUBAR"; with "VFR GPS" in
the remarks ATC might go along, assuming you'll end up making a nice
beeline for FUBAR.


Or you could drop all the silliness and just ask for direct FUBAR.



Officially you're on Radar Vectors and ATC retains
responsibility for you; in practice you're no added trouble because you
can head somewhere better than without your "VFR GPS" on board.


ATC is just as responsible for you if you're proceeding direct to FUBAR.



That's the reason I've always understood for "VFR GPS ON BOARD" and why
I occasionally specify it filing IFR.


"VFR GPS ON BOARD" tells ATC you have a VFR GPS on board and nothing else.
Stop playing these silly games. If you want to proceed direct them just
file direct. Doesn't matter if you file /U, /A, /G, or put "VFR GPS" in
remarks.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U Judah Instrument Flight Rules 8 February 27th 04 06:02 PM
Direct To a waypoint in flightplan on Garmin 430 Andrew Gideon Instrument Flight Rules 21 February 18th 04 01:31 AM
"Direct when able" Mitchell Gossman Instrument Flight Rules 18 October 21st 03 01:19 AM
Filing direct John Harper Instrument Flight Rules 10 October 9th 03 10:23 AM
Don Brown and lat-long Bob Gardner Instrument Flight Rules 30 September 29th 03 03:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.