A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Jim Weir: help to add car radio to aviation audio panel music input



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16  
Old April 21st 05, 01:57 AM
Robert Bonomi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ofC9e.56373$lz2.17509@fed1read07,
Carl / KG6YKL wrote:
RST Engineering wrote:

jury-rig solution


Okay, this is way off topic but I have to know the history of this
expression. It is my understanding that the correct term is
"Jerry-rigged" or "Jerryrigged" which is based on the pejorative term
"Jerry" for Japanese, used during WWII. The way it was told to me is
that near the end of WWII Jerry (the Japanese) were badly beaten and
much of their equipment was non-operational. However the Japanese
were very resourceful at doing whatever it took to get things working.
So people started talking about "Jerry-rigging" things.


All well and good, except for one fact. "Jerry" referred to the _Germans_,
not the Japanese.

Oh, yeah, a second "inconvenient" fact -- the term _was_ in use *before*
WWII.

Obviously the term "Jerry" is racially insensitive which probably led
to the alteration of the term.


Obviously "nonsense". grin

However, isn't "Jerryrigged" a
complimentary term when you consider it implies resourcefulness?


It's usually used in a mildly disparaging way -- implying an "ad hoc"
solution of a _temporary_ nature, and, thus, a lack of durability,
Something where it will be necessary to "come back later, and do it right".

In an _emergency_ situation, such methodologies are justified.
In a non-emergency, it's because somebody wasn't willing to expend
the effort to 'do it right' the _first_ time; with the expectation that
"somebody else" will be responsible for 'making it right' later.

Thus, the pejorative meaning -- because it is _usually_ applied to
"non-emergency" constructs.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Aviation Conspiracy: FAA Calls Controller Whistleblowers "Rogue Employees!!! Bill Mulcahy General Aviation 0 March 31st 05 04:29 AM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Piloting 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM
Marine Radio using Aviation Antennae Jim Weir Home Built 13 August 12th 03 10:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.