![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The AIM is not regulatory and there is no requirement that limits usage to
authorized units. That is definitely incorrect. TSO-C129. GPS units have to be certified to use under IFR. Otherwise I could pick up a golf ball on a string and call it an attitude indicator and say that meets the minimum requirement for an AI under IFR flight. Or I can pick up a sextant and call it a FMS and then file slant-whatever it is. I spent literally 2 minute searching but couldn't find that TSO but this is from the FAA and has many references saying that GPS's are required to be certified for use under IFR. http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/faa/8400/...4/4_001_02.pdf I'll have to do some more research to find the exact regulation. I do realize that the AIM is not regulatory but GPS's definitely need to be certified otherwise some GPS's (Garmin 430 which I"m most familiar with) wouldn't need to be placarded as "VFR only" when the owner didn't go through the IFR certification for the unit. Do you base your life off of something completely untested? Are tested units failure-proof? absolutely not but at least they have been tested and designed to a standard for aviation use and no standard other than being light, convenient and as cheap as possible for the hiking crowd. What you are saying is my Garmin V designed for automobile navigation is legal to fly under IFR even though it updates about once every 4 seconds. Another person wrote: My sextant isn't authorized either. Doesn't mean I can't use it to navigate under IFR. incorrect unless there is a TSO for it. and just what is "situational awareness" anyway? Well navigation is being able to follow a vector (speed and in 3D). The situational awareness is what is happening elsewise such as are mountains nearby, how high above the ground you are, weather, etc. the both are helpful to know of course but are independent. You can navigate by being at the right position all day long without knowing what the heck is going on around you. Lastly, I have to admit I'm far from an expert. In fact my IFR checkride is in 2 weeks. But this stuff is almost a given. Gerald Sylvester |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U | Judah | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | February 27th 04 06:02 PM |
Direct To a waypoint in flightplan on Garmin 430 | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | February 18th 04 01:31 AM |
"Direct when able" | Mitchell Gossman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | October 21st 03 01:19 AM |
Filing direct | John Harper | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | October 9th 03 10:23 AM |
Don Brown and lat-long | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | September 29th 03 03:24 AM |