![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() As you can readily discern, the cause of the closure is apparently economically based (as opposed to safety based) due to limited aircraft parking facilities available on the airport. My question is, why should VFR operations be banned in favor of IFR operations if discrimination is forbidden under AIP agreement contract terms? If Friedman Memorial Airport has not received any AIP funding within the last 20 years, my question is moot, but that's unlikely. The prime qualification for employment as an airport manager is the ability to successfully write AIP grant proposals. On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:06:48 -0700, "BTIZ" wrote in XtV9e.15984$%c1.13283@fed1read05:: Limited discrimination is not restricted under AIP terms... I was unable to locate the document(s) governing AIP terms, but I did find the section I had in mind (included below). It doesn't seem to address what is happening in Idaho however. this is for a set period during periods of abnormally high traffic... Yes. That's what the article indicates. there are various ways to restrict traffic flow... if this were a permanent restriction.. then there may be arguments. Are you familiar with other incidents of similar traffic restrictions using IFR flight as the criterion? This happens all the time when a major aviation convention is in a certain area. AOPA, SnF, NBAA, etc. When an airport is unable to accommodate the traffic, ATC has various methods of restricting the flow, but I've never seen the requirement for an IFR flight plan in VMC used to govern traffic flow. Another way to restrict traffic is to require Prior Approval or a reservation slot for arrival. Some aircraft can be guaranteed a parking spot.. others must only drop pax, gas and go.. BT ================================================ United State Code TITLE 49 - TRANSPORTATION SUBTITLE VII - AVIATION PROGRAMS PART B - AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT AND NOISE CHAPTER 471 - AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT SUBCHAPTER I - AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT Sec. 47101. Policies (a) General. - It is the policy of the United States - (1) that the safe operation of the airport and airway system is the highest aviation priority; .... 9) that artificial restrictions on airport capacity - (A) are not in the public interest; (B) should be imposed to alleviate air traffic delays only after other reasonably available and less burdensome alternatives have been tried; and (C) should not discriminate unjustly between categories and classes of aircraft; ... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WI airport closure | Mike Spera | Owning | 0 | March 9th 05 01:53 PM |
N94 Airport may expand into mobile home community, locals supportive | William Summers | Piloting | 0 | March 18th 04 03:03 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |