![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() An instrument approach requires an IAF. In the case of an ILS approach, this must be separate to the ILS localiser and glideslope because of the directive nature of the aid. The most common solution is to use an NDB to provide the IAF and base the procedure on that. NDBs installed in conjunction with instrument approach aids are generally lower power than en-route NDBs. You could, in theory, use a VOR as the IAF as well, however. Also marker beacons are notorious for going on the blink, so a co-located NDB with the outer marker (called "LOC") provides an additional check for ranging on the final approach. (in some cases, the ILS system might not even have marker beacons, in which case an NDB will be required at the OM location). Remember that not all ILS systems have DME associated, so some form of range checking is required. The vast majority of ILS approaches in Europe use an NDB as the IAF and many of them use an NDB LOCator (colocated with outer marker). My local airport has several instrument procedures: ILS/NDB, NDB Only, VOR, and VDF. There is no DME on either the ILS or the VOR and since the VOR is on the A/D and not 7.5 nautical miles out like the NDB, it can't reasonably be used as the IAF for the ILS approach without totally throwing totally non-standard timings into the equation. (as it is already the VOR approach [non-precision] already has a non-standard outbound timing to begin base turn). You will find that even on some of the more advanced European airports, there are NDBs associated with the ILS at the outer marker location. (Heathrow, Gatwick, Stanstead, Luton, East Midlands, Birmingham, Paris Orly, Paris Charles de Gaulle, all have NDB LOCs at around 8 nautical miles out.). Also most holding procedures in the Europe use NDBs as the holding fix. (there are currently NO operationally published GPS approaches in the UK, and the CAA and even JAA are tending to be somewhat wary of implementing GPS procedures for instrument approaches.) Regards, Leland On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 08:40:13 -0500, "Gig Giacona" wrote: Let's see if I have this straight and please forgive any ignorance on my part. When I got my PP-SEL in ELD '79-'80 there was no ILS or NDB approach at ELD just VOR. All the pilots bitched including the Lear and Citation pilots and their bosses and ELD gets an ILS. But it gets put in requireing ADF that even then was on the way out. This is the silliest thing I have ever heard of. "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Gig, the initial approach fix (IAF) is defined by the NDB. how would you find this point without an ADF? You'd get around that with radar vectors, but you couldn't fly the full procedure without the NDB. And the missed approach is a hold on the NDB. Same problem. BUT: An approach certified GPS with the NDB in it's database can replace for the ADF. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
The perfect approach | Capt.Doug | Home Built | 25 | December 3rd 04 03:37 AM |
Which aircraft certification is required for R&D? | Netgeek | Home Built | 5 | November 23rd 04 05:59 AM |
LSA Approach speeds | Ace Pilot | Home Built | 0 | February 3rd 04 05:38 PM |
Download approach charts | Ron Natalie | Home Built | 0 | July 9th 03 08:29 PM |