![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Esres wrote:
Lots of experienced, proficient pilots out there with no knowledge of obstacle clearance requirements. Lots of experienced, proficient pilots with lousy radio technique. Lots of experienced, proficient pilots who don't understand how airplanes fly. You comment how I bought into the responses I received to my original question in this thread, then proceed to spout the above and the theory about student knowledge retention as if I should just accept these ideas. Sorry, but unless you can back the above comments up with an official definition of "lots," "lousy," "experienced," and "proficient," I simply read this as just another pilot's opinions. Six years instructing, and sampling knowledge levels after training is over? Just out of curiosity, in the last six years were the majority of your hours were accumulated through instructing? Did you have time before your instructor rating to fly with a purpose to many destinations? I ask this seriously because I don't want to underestimate your background. However, the title "instrument instructor" alone doesn't do it for me since I have met a few instrument instructors with zero IMC time. But any learning theory book will supply you with the studies you seek, if common sense doesn't. Common sense? How is it common sense that a student only retains a small fraction of what they were taught? It seems to me that any instructor hiding behind this "theory" may want to consider the manner in which he is teaching the material, rather than concede that this as true. I don't disagree with the answers you received on this question, but you bought into the idea that turning to the heading is "close enough" without any idea of whether the posters knew what they were talking about. Would an incorrect response to an IFR procedure question posted in this newsgroup survive uncontested by the many experienced regulars? The 100% agreement between the responders in this thread was pretty telling. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
KCNH departure procedure. | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | August 24th 04 10:52 PM |
Notes on NACO Obstacle Departure Procedures | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | July 15th 04 10:20 PM |
Procedure Turn | Bravo8500 | Instrument Flight Rules | 65 | April 22nd 04 03:27 AM |
Interesting Departure Procedu MRB Trixy Two | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | February 18th 04 11:42 PM |