![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blanche wrote:
And what happens if the engine conks out? Where do you land? How do you land? Maybe he should also take glider lessons, mountain survival, parachuting, and aerobatics prior to the flight. I mean, those disciplines have just as much relevance if not more should a forced landing be immanent. How does a knowledge of mountain flying help you to land with and engine out? And how would that differ from any other no-engine landing? About the only thing I could think of would be to try to estimate winds and direction based on terrain features. Read Sparky's book and you have some theory to work off of but, really....do you think that this would sufficiently arm you for an encounter with the winds in the mountains? If you do then you have never flown *in* the mountains! As far as *where* you land...you land wherever you can; as in non-mountainous terrain. And when that happens, all of a sudden you need to worry about mountain waves, density altitude, valley winds, etc. Calculate glide distance from 16K and tell me where & how you're going to land. Well...if you know how far you can glide at 1000 ft you can multiply by sixteen. But that calculation would only give you the no-wind theoretical distance. It also something every pilot should know regardless of whether they are in the mountains or not. And, come on! Are you really going to pull out the ole' whiz wheel and think about "...density altitude, valley winds, etc." when you are dead-sticking it to a suitable landing site? Generally, you *might* have one place to land that is suitable and you can bet your gold-plated E6B you'll take it regardless of the "density altitude". I have always considered mountain flying to be flying *in* the mountains and the things that concern a mountain pilot to be at or below the peaks. Is this incorrect? yes. Really? And minus the engine out scenario, you think the guy cruising over the peaks at 16-19,000 ft is in need of *mountain flying* skills? That ain't *mountain flying* in my book...neither is it in Sparkũ's.(Which, I agree, is a great book!) Sorry, but I respectfully disagree. Antonio |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
TSA rule 49 CFR Part 1552 (or its misinterpretation) is already preventing people from flying (even renters) (long) | Bay Aviator | Piloting | 15 | October 21st 04 10:29 PM |
the thrill of flying interview is here! | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 0 | October 21st 03 07:41 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |