![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G. Sylvester" wrote in message m... correct. if they say "vectors for traffic" and you lose comm, squawk 7600 and then fly direct to your next fix as that is your clearance. if they say "fly heading 060" (but not for traffic), it is to intercept an approach course or victor/jet airway but it is for something. If they are just handing out vectors to nowhere just to vector you around the Class B, well do as they say in thee book. Do as cleared (but with no further explanation) - expected (they didn't say anything) - filed. Fly to the next fix even if it is behind you and then continue on as filed. If they ask you then they can also listen to the tapes and they should 'expect' a better clearance from their controllers. How can the next fix be behind you? Are you thinking of a situation where the vectors have turned you completely around? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Florida Mil and NASA Comms Log - Tues, 18 May 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 4 | July 10th 04 02:00 AM |
Florida Military Comms Log - Thurs 15 Apr 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 1 | April 17th 04 08:38 PM |
Q about lost comms on weird clearance | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 34 | February 2nd 04 09:11 PM |
Lost comms after radar vector | Mike Ciholas | Instrument Flight Rules | 119 | January 31st 04 11:39 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |