![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in message news:iqbbe.6406$Nc.4745@trnddc08... "Morgans" wrote in message news ![]() There is some disagreement with this, and here is a clip: Normally the rotor clouds is centered beneath the lenticular cloud. Most often it extends anywhere from ground level to mountaintop level, but is frequently observed up to 35,000 feet. Destructive turbulence from the rotor rarely exists more than 2,000-3,000 feet above mountaintop level. http://www.mountainflying.com/mountain_wave2.htm My point is, just because you clear the ridge, there are still dangers that can ruin your day, if the winds are right. Further down in the article, this author talks about rotors that do not have a visible cloud. If the wind is blowing strong, close to perpendicular to the ridge, best wait until early the next day, and see if the winds are calmed down. Hey, I just read, and remember. I have no idea if what everyone says is true. I would rather be safe, than sorry. YMMV -- Jim in NC Hmmmm, I've been through the rotor a few times -- while yanking and banking on the end of a 200' length of towrope behind a tow-plane. The first time is the worst. After that you remember to breathe and you don't suck quite as hard on the seat cushion. When you're headed for the primary wave developed on the east slope of the Sierra, the rotor is unavoidable. Some folks, with more skill than I possess, ride thermals up into the secondary wave and, when high enough slide over to the primary. I guess I never thought of the rotor as destructive. Maybe I shouldn't do that again. It can be fatal but that is an extreme case with winds at ridgetop level over 100kts. There is a chapter in Exploring the Monster describing a flight into a rotor by Mt. Tom which is slightly north of Bishop where the glider broke up and the pilots were subject to +16G and -20G. I have actually "heard" rotors hissing and roaring near Genoa, NV with winds over 100kts at ridge level but calm in the valley because of a strong inversion so it happens but only in extreme weather. It was a textbook day for a record attempt but nobody flew out of Minden that day. In any case, gliders are much better suited to thiese conditions than GA airplanes. Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
TSA rule 49 CFR Part 1552 (or its misinterpretation) is already preventing people from flying (even renters) (long) | Bay Aviator | Piloting | 15 | October 21st 04 10:29 PM |
the thrill of flying interview is here! | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 0 | October 21st 03 07:41 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |