|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#18
July 16th 03, 03:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert Henry" wrote in message news:QQ1Ra.15617$o54.10140@lakeread05... Perhaps (words twice), the safety pilot who agrees to be/log PIC should understand the liability they are accepting for the flight even though they are not manipulating the controls. At least, that is the more important issue to me. Also, as I understand it, PIC MUST (not better) be worked out in advance. Anytime you have more than one pilot in an airplane, it behooves them to understand what their respective roles are going to be. The "MUST" means that you have to know who is the PIC at the time the fight is occurring, you can't just sit down and juggle the numbers later. How can the PIC assume his job of responsibility if he only finds out he had the job after the flight was over? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Instrument Hole Punch | [email protected] | Home Built | 4 | February 3rd 05 09:17 PM |
| Instrument panel labelling options | John Galban | Home Built | 12 | November 18th 04 10:42 PM |
| Instrument mounting question | Rob Turk | Home Built | 4 | July 19th 04 10:33 PM |
| Aluminum instrument panel finish? | Richard Riley | Home Built | 31 | February 4th 04 02:09 AM |
| NDB approaches -- what are they good for? | Dylan Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | July 10th 03 09:15 PM |
Threaded Mode