A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Human factors RECKLESSNESS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22  
Old April 29th 05, 04:37 PM
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stewart Kissel" wrote in
message ...
At 03:30 29 April 2005, Dudley Henriques wrote:


Snip------

Somewhere in my aviation library is a quote that can
be summarized as...'Showing off with an aircraft is
a good way to get killed'.

I use that theme combined with the fact that nothing
we do in gliders is worth risking our lives unnecesarily
for...

And no, that does not meant we don't go fly....and
take acceptable risks...


Good point. Any advice to "never take risks" is likely to be ignored under
some circumstances. "Never take stupid risks" is more likely to be
acceptable.

When confronted with a situation involving risks, I try to do a quick
"upside/downside" analysis. This is a sort of. "What do I gain if this
works?" vs. "What do I lose if it doesn't?" Since gliding is a sport, it's
hard to see this analysis supporting much risk except, perhaps, for a pilot
two points out of first place in a national contest on the last day.

Over the years I have lost a number of friends and acquaintances to glider
aerobatics. This leads me to the view that glider aerobatics is usually a
"stupid risk" since it rarely passes the "upside/downside" analysis. For
me, an adrenaline rush is not a reward but punishment for a mistake. I try
to avoid it.

It's possibly worth adding that risks appear differently to pilots with
different levels of experience and in different situations. I was once
criticized for an XC over what appeared to the critic as unlandable terrain.
What he didn't know was that I had previously carefully surveyed the terrain
in question by car and found several safe landing areas and noted their GPS
coordinates. I was always in gliding range to a safe landing area although
it appeared otherwise to this critic.

Or, possibly, he regarded paved airports as the only safe landing areas.
This seems to have become a widely held opinion. Off-airport landings seem
to hold a horror for many pilots these days even though they can be much
more convenient and less hassle than many airports where gliders are
regarded as a nuisance.

Bill Daniels

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Human factors RECKLESSNESS private Piloting 68 May 10th 05 05:52 AM
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe Naval Aviation 5 August 21st 04 12:50 AM
What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe Military Aviation 3 August 21st 04 12:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Š2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.