![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:19:46 GMT, Ryan Ferguson wrote:
Basically you can apply for Cat II authorization at Cat II runways with 'standard' avionics equipment (i.e. your normal GA spamcan) and a waiver for Cat II authorization on Cat I approaches. FAR 91.193 is the reg that states the FAA may grant authorization to 'small aircraft' for deviation from 91.189, 91.191, and 91.205(f). The FAA has granted authorization to both Part 91 and Part 125 operators to use less than standard minimums on CAT I ILS's. A few years ago, when I went through the CAT II authorization process in my Mooney, my recollection was that this was not possible for my a/c. If I recall correctly, the issue was that the various waivers were authorized to be issued for my performance of CAT II approaches at CAT II runways. However, there was no similar waiver authority to allow special CAT I minimums with the equipment I had in my a/c. The authorization and/or waiver only applies to a certain pilot in a certain aircraft. There are some slightly different currency requirements, and gaining the authorization/waiver requires a flight check in the specific aircraft for which the authorization/waiver is sought. The flight check is done with a fed onboard and uses the instrument rating PTS, but always includes at least a two-engine ILS to Cat II minimums and a single-engine ILS with a single-engine missed approach. Before you even go flying, the Fed's also do an inspection of the aircraft to ensure that all the equipment requirements are met. At least in a single engine a/c, the minimum required flight check consists of only two approaches -- one to a full-stop; one to a missed approach with a DH of 100' AGL. Of course, the FAA examiner is always looking at you for attitude and general flying ability anyway. In a multi-engine approach, there is a requirement to do a single engine missed approach with the critical engine set at idle or zero thrust before reaching the middle marker. In addition, the standard for flying the approach is no more than 1/4 scale deflection of either LOC or GP needles. That may be more rigorous than the Instrument PTS, but I don't have that information handy. I find the whole thing quite intriguing, really. It was an interesting experience. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The perfect approach | Capt.Doug | Home Built | 25 | December 3rd 04 03:37 AM |
LSA Approach speeds | Ace Pilot | Home Built | 0 | February 3rd 04 05:38 PM |
Why is ADF required on ILS approach? | Rich Raine | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | August 1st 03 05:14 PM |
NDB approaches -- what are they good for? | Dylan Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | July 10th 03 09:15 PM |
Download approach charts | Ron Natalie | Home Built | 0 | July 9th 03 08:29 PM |