![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sydney Hoeltzli writes:
Just out of curiousity, though, how did your DE handle partial panel, steep turns, and unusual attitudes? Those are not part of the Canadian IFR flight test, though we do them all in training, and get tested on unusual attitude recovery under the hood for the PPL (if I recall correctly). The IFR flight test itself is just normal ops. It would be hard to say which approach is best. Our DFTE *is* allowed to fail instruments or avionics during the test -- I lost my DME for the NDB approach -- but it's rare to get anything too hard the first time through. On the other hand, we have to retake the IFR flight test every two years, and the DFTE's tend to get tougher on the recurrency tests (i.e. covering the AI and HI, or pulling the circuit breaker for the TC and waiting to see how long it takes you to notice). All the best, David -- David Megginson, , http://www.megginson.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Hole Punch | [email protected] | Home Built | 4 | February 3rd 05 09:17 PM |
Instrument panel labelling options | John Galban | Home Built | 12 | November 18th 04 10:42 PM |
Instrument mounting question | Rob Turk | Home Built | 4 | July 19th 04 10:33 PM |
Aluminum instrument panel finish? | Richard Riley | Home Built | 31 | February 4th 04 02:09 AM |
Logging instrument approaches | Slav Inger | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | July 27th 03 11:00 PM |