![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, Stonecipher bragged about the move in an AvWeek interview.
He said he gave the civil helicopter guys three years to make money. When they didn't, he sold 'em. The explanation from Mesa at the time of the divestituture was the big-shots at Boeing did not want to waste their time selling one or two MD500s or MDExplorers piecemeal to police departments or hospitals. They saw themselves as global players moving 50 747s in a single order. A 20-year Apache or Chinook program was worthy of their efforts. Lost on such Captains of Industry is the fact that the civil and military sides of the helicopter business are closely connected. Suddenly, the Army wants 368 Armed Reconnaissance Helicopters, and Boeing has no air vehicle. The decision also gave Eurocopter global market share it might not have otherwise gained. I do hope this works out because the MDHI product line is such a good one. I suspect a Little-Bird based ARH would be a better combat helicopter than an upgraded Bell 407. HW |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |