![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew" wrote in message
ATC says "radar contact, 20 miles south of XYZ, proceed on course". Do you acknowledge this transmission? How about when ATC says "altimeter setting 2992" on your first contact after a handoff? Does this require acknowledgement? Yes. In the past, I've acknowledged such things if the controller was not busy. But I've heard all kinds. Some people read back the altimeter setting. I've even heard people reading back the "radar contact" message. I feel that this is a waste of bandwidth. However, I don't know what ATC prefers. Do they want read back for everything, or should we shut up as much as possible? Learn to get a quick feel for how busy they are. NYC Class B is insanely busy and ATC there can practically tell what you mean if all you do is grunt. Try to anticipate how important your read back will be to them. Traffic confirmation, exact traffic confirmation, helps them immensely and is worth the time to let them know if you're really sure you have the traffic they're talking about. Things like radar contact and altimeter setting only require your abbreviated call sign (assuming that's how they ID you) as a response. Xponder code should be read back if you have the slightest doubt you you've heard it correctly. If things are slow, read back everything. If you can arrange it, pay a visit to a tower or ATC facility. It's worth the time. moo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What F-102 units were called up for Viet Nam | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 101 | March 5th 06 03:13 AM |