![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know what an "M1" is. I think you you plan on mounting your
engine to the fuselage, then mounting the fuselage on some sort of wheeled table so that you can move the assembly around, and also run the engine (not while you're moving it around, of course). And you want it to be simple, cheap and easy to build, made out of 2 x 4's held together with drywall screws and duct tape. I happen to know a very simple solution, much simpler than building a custom carriage. This method has been thoroughly tested and it really is the way that at least 99% of successful aircraft builders do it. Attach both wings and the landing gear to the aircraft, and then hook up all engine and airframe systems before running the engine. That way the aircraft is easy to move around on its own wheels, you have a safe engine test stand for engine break in, and you're running the aircraft as a complete system, the way it was designed to work. Why would anyone want to do it any differently? Skystar Aircraft, manufacturers of the Kitfox, almost went bankrupt when a runaway 182 went through their hangar. The A&P mechanic decided to test run the engine without installing the pilot seats. He had the throttle linkage backwards. When the engine ran away from him, he lost his balance in the unfurnished cockpit and became a baggage compartment passenger while the 182 made a full throttle tour of Skystar's hangar. $300,000 in uninsured damage for Skystar. That sounds like the kind of adventure you're preparing for. Dick wrote: Having a "better G" idea, decided to hang my engine on M1 fuselage without wings in order to have the ability to roll it outside the hanger for breakin efforts. After struggling with several versions of a wooden framed, wheeled "wagon", a thought occurred that I may be "reinventing the wheel" (as usual). Has anyone out there found a method to move the "engine on fuselage without wings" or move a completed plane with one wing removed?? The M1 has main gear on the wings, not on the fuselage. Thanks, Dick -- John Kimmel Naturally, these humorous remarks are all entirely my own opinion, based solely on rumor, supposition, innuendo and damned lies, and should be interpreted in a spirit of fun. My memory is faulty, also. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | July 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | June 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | April 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | March 1st 04 07:27 AM |