![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:iUgfe.56866$r53.43501@attbi_s21... The US is a "wealthy people", and we clean up "our" environment by polluting other people's (such as Iraq). Clueless. Why risk leaking our oil all over the Alaskan tundra What has been the history of the Alaska pipeline since it was built? when we can let Iraq take the eco-hit, and save our own? That's the thinking. He wouldn't know thinking if it bit him in the ass. That's an interesting way to look at trade. I always thought that the people who were getting paid were in the driver's seat -- but your theory seems to put the buyer's in control. Pure Keynesianism. Maybe that was once the case, but I would submit that the current world energy model does not support your theory. (Although Iraq is not fully re-integrated into the free market, so their case is a bit different.) It would appear that the sellers are in command -- and have been for a good long time -- and we're transferring nothing to them but our wealth. As above. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|