![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The other consideration with respect to the reconnaisance role is that the
McDonnell-Douglas designed mast-mounted sensor ball is, ironically, incompatible witht the MD500 series but compatible with the OH-58D/407 rotor system. It's a great asset in both the reconnaissance and "armed" modes. "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "CTR" wrote in message oups.com... I worked for McDonnell Douglas for over eleven years, and I think that the MD 500 is a great aircraft. But for the ARH mission of "urban warfare", IMHO the Bell 407 is the aircraft of choice. Special Ops like their agile Little Bird. The aircraft is like a fencing foil, light and precise. Ideal for special Ops. The program is for armed recon, not assault aircraft, correct? At the same time Army pilots love their Kiowa Warriors. The OH-58Ds are like a battle ax or broad sword. In Iraq and Afghanistan urban combat they have taken rounds through their rotor blades and pitch links and still brought their crews home. The re-engined 407 will be able to carry more armor and weapons than the MD500. The 407 also has room in back for two warriors, three in a pinch. They are also proven to be more reliable and easier to maintain. The MD500 may be a great two seat sports car like a Ferrari. But for urban warfare and constant use, the Army needs a Muscle car like a Mustang that can take a beating. I'd say the nimble characteristics of the MD500/530 would be an advantage for the RECON bird. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |