![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message news:B4ege.440$Ld4.227@trndny04... Matt Whiting wrote: Matt Barrow wrote: No, it doesn't. The point made, though, is that private industry "could do what the NWS does", and that's plain BS. True. A private industry would do what the NWS does only better and less expensively. Unlikely. That's a situation in which competition wouldn't really be feasible. You have only to look at the way AT&T was handling their monopoly and charging structure in the '70s to see that the charges would almost certainly be considerably higher than what we pay in taxes to support NWS today. Key word: monopoly. Context: government mandated and enforced monopoly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
They are trying to remove your weather access | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 34 | June 29th 05 10:31 PM |
Senate Bill S.786 could kill NWS internet weather products | FlyBoy | Home Built | 61 | May 16th 05 09:31 PM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |