![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
It would have to be a =much= better reason than most. It would have to be in any case, given all the other reasons not to go to a large Class B airport. So what? I don't understand the question. The fees at large commercial airports are very much higher than fees elsewhere, although I have found bargains at times. I've landed spam cans at Logan and National for example during times when they were holding a sale. The high fees serve as a deterrent - to a sufficent extent that most spam cans avoid the airport. Long taxiways do not act as strongly as a deterrent (though I've taxiied for more than an hour at Dulles - I was glad I was on tach time and not hobbs!). While the exec who flies his jet into the city for an important meeting can justify a hundred dollar landing fee, the small business owner who is also a pilot and flies a 172 is likely to have a much harder time justifying it. He's likely to fly elsewhere and take a cab, even if it takes a bit longer. Yes, a 172 landing in front of a line of 747s will have a strong impact on the airport's traffic pattern, and this should be figured in. It wouldn't be so bad if there were nearby reliever airports (or even reliever runways), but around the big hubs, the relievers are generally not all that close. Flushing Airport would have been nice, alas it's gone. There's nothing in Boston except Logan. We all know about DC... Actually, with controllers worth their salt, a 172 can be slipped in between two airliners with less delay than another airliner in the same line would induce. The one time I flew into Logan, the controller had me fly the "something bridge visual" and I made a close-in base to maybe a 3/4 mile final. I was in the final approach for a very short time. And my time on the runway was far shorter than an airliner making its roll-out. Sure, if they line up the 172 on a 10 mile final, then you will wreak havoc on the traffic flow, but no controller with a clue would do that. I've flown into a number of fairly large airports (Logan, Philly, BWI, Washington National, etc.) and I never delayed an airliner. The controllers uniformly did an excellent job of bringing me in on a close pattern and I either landed on a GA runway (PHL and BWI) or dropped into the airliner chain with narry a hiccup. Matt Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
User Fees | Dude | Owning | 36 | March 19th 05 05:57 PM |
NAA Fees to the US Team | Doug Jacobs | Soaring | 2 | October 29th 04 01:09 AM |
LXE installation XP, strict user permissions. | Hannes | Soaring | 0 | March 21st 04 11:15 PM |
The Irony of Boeing/Jeppesen Being Charged User Fees! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | January 23rd 04 12:23 PM |
Angel Flight pilots: Ever have an FBO refuse to wave landing fees? | Peter R. | Piloting | 11 | August 2nd 03 01:20 AM |