![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Correction time,
Geoffrey Sinclair wrote in message ... Overall according to the USAAF statistical digest the 8th Air force flew 1,034,052 heavy bomber sorties, 898,758 considered effective, losing 2,439 to flak. So between a 0.23 and 0.27% loss rate. The RAF considered 5% loss rates unsustainable long term and the USAAF seems to have agreed. The heavy bomber loss figure is correct but the sortie totals are not, I managed to use the total sorties for all types, heavy bomber sorties totalled 332,904 airborne and 274,921 effective, giving loss rates for heavy bombers to flak guns between 0.73 and 0.89%, depending whether you use airborne or effective sorties. Sorry for the error. Geoffrey Sinclair Remove the nb for email. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
50% of NAZI oil was supplied from US | Grantland | Military Aviation | 106 | January 18th 14 07:58 PM |
Fuse the Wire or Fuse the Device? | ContestID67 | Soaring | 11 | April 27th 05 03:13 AM |
FDR and Bush 43 | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 44 | June 24th 04 12:16 AM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
German historian provokes row over war photos | BackToNormal | Military Aviation | 21 | October 24th 03 11:32 PM |