![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marty Shapiro" wrote in message
... Lets take a look at data from AirNav for 2 high fee and 2 zero fee class B airport: [snipped] The data you posted simply supports my point. Even at the no-fee airports, there aren't that many airplanes (especially considering the size of the airport). 100 planes just isn't that many. There are plenty of reasons to stay away from large Class B airports other than landing fees. But regardless, looking at based aircraft isn't relevant. What you want is operations. And the data you show don't actually suggest an "effective ban". At one "high fee" airport, GA makes up 5% of the traffic, with the "no fee" airports showing only between 11% and 24%. That's hardly a slam dunk for the point you're trying to make. If the airport is public use, it can not legally ban light GA aircraft. All it can do is highly discourage them from landing. Yes. One method of discouraging light GA aircraft from landing is to impose a high fee. Yes. However, if they make the fee prohibitive enough to achieve a complete ban (which is probably impossible as there is always some one with deep enough pockets who could pay it) they would then run afoul of the FAA. One airport authority tried this at their class B and got slammed down by the FAA. Airports have had trouble imposing unreasonable fees, yes. But one would think that the FAA would consider a fee high enough to "ban light GA for all practical purposes" to be unreasonable. After all, that's the point of their objection. If anything, that state of affairs suggests that no airports "effectively ban" light GA. If you want a definition, I'll give you one. If there are viable reliever airport(s) at a location with a class B airport, a fee which effectively bans light GA aircraft at the class B is one where 98% of the transient light GA aircraft operations at that location take place at the reliever airport(s). That definition has no logical validity, since it ignores reasons for using the reliever airport unrelated to the landing fee. See the above data from AirNav contrasting high fee class B with no fee class B. I did. It doesn't support what you're saying. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
User Fees | Dude | Owning | 36 | March 19th 05 05:57 PM |
NAA Fees to the US Team | Doug Jacobs | Soaring | 2 | October 29th 04 01:09 AM |
LXE installation XP, strict user permissions. | Hannes | Soaring | 0 | March 21st 04 11:15 PM |
The Irony of Boeing/Jeppesen Being Charged User Fees! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | January 23rd 04 12:23 PM |
Angel Flight pilots: Ever have an FBO refuse to wave landing fees? | Peter R. | Piloting | 11 | August 2nd 03 01:20 AM |