![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Wise wrote in
: In article , Charlie Wolf wrote: Well - in keeping with the recently posted NG charter for this joint, I offer this up: Do group members here think this is a good idea?? My days as an AW (S-3A's & B's) concentrated on sub-hunting and aviation acoustic analysis, ISAR RADR, MAD, et al. But merging the rating with mechs and metal smiths seems to me is kinda broad-based. What are the rating exams going to look like? In my day, we had AW's in the following specialties: - acoustic - non-acoustic - helo You do know that us helo AW's go through basic and advanced acoustical training as well as do airborne acoustical analysis in the fleet...right? This article would leave one thinking that the AW rating will now have numerous sub-specialties; none of which are related to any of the others, except that they all have gold wings and draw ACIP. I have to wonder what this will do to ranks of traditionally ground-pounder ratings merged (AMS, AO, AE, AD, PR, etc.) of the HS/HSL community. I'm not sure if things have changed or not, but when I was in, if you were helo aircrew; you had to be SAR qualified. I seriously doubt even 1/3 of the people filling those rates in the squadrons I was in or worked around could have made it through SAR school. I have to wonder what percentage of those other rates can even make it through the training pipeline...much less qualify for the security clearances traditionally required of the AW rating. It sounds to me that they may soften up and dumb down all requirements across the board. That certainly will give them the numbers (the Navy always seems to be short of SAR people), but I have to believe the human element of helo ASW will be much less effective. The conversion is ONLY for folks in the affected ratings who are AIRCREW. Many of these people are not working directly in their ratings anyway, so it would have little negative effect on shop readiness. In fact, it migh inprove shop manning because they would no longer have to eat these unfilled billets "out of hide". Dave in San Diego |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|