![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message news:T0Wge.4970$1f5.1194@trndny01... Mike Rapoport wrote: It isn't supposed to require either a leap of faith or the company remaining in business. The Company is suppose to deposit money to fund the pension plan which is a trust with an independent board. The funds are professionally managed and, barring catastrophe, there should be enough to pay the promised benefits. The problem is that the funds are typically invested in stocks and/or bonds. If the market is doing well, the employer only has to contribute money for relatively new employees -- employees who have been there a while already have substantial funds, and the returns on that provide the necessary increase. If, however, the market isn't doing well, the company has to make continuing deposits, usually at a time in which they aren't making very much themselves. My former employer is typical in this regard. In early 2001, the market was still cooking, and my former employer had the pension funds in stocks. As the market collapsed later in the year, there was a rush to shift everything to bonds. Then came the ENRON scandal. Congress reacted to that by increasing the amount of equity employers had to keep in their pension plans. That meant that companies that had pension plans suddenly had to scrape up substantial amounts of cash to add to them at a time that the market was forcing them to divert more and more of their income to the plans anyway. My company reacted in two ways. First, they laid off anyone who was close to either a 2 year or a 5 year service anniversary (those are the dates that pensions become partially and fully vested). That freed up a lot of funds that could be allocated to pensions for other employees. Second, they changed the pension plan to a "cash balance payout" plan. This works sort of like Bush's "private account" option for Social Security. The company pays in a certain amount into your pension. If the market does well during your career, you'll get a big lump sum when you retire; if not, you'll get a tiny lump sum when you retire. George Patterson There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the mashed potatoes. Companies aren't required to fund plans on a daily or even annual basis and react to every decline in their investments. There is an assumed rate of return and the company is required to fund the plans so that there will be enough to pay benefits if the assumed rate of return is earned. Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 07:31 PM |
Osama bin Laaden | Big John | Piloting | 2 | January 12th 04 04:05 AM |
Big Kahunas | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 360 | December 20th 03 12:59 AM |
Two Years of War | Stop Spam! | Military Aviation | 3 | October 9th 03 11:05 AM |
U.S. is losing the sympathy of the world | John Mullen | Military Aviation | 149 | September 22nd 03 03:42 PM |