A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

boycott united forever



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old May 13th 05, 03:15 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:T0Wge.4970$1f5.1194@trndny01...
Mike Rapoport wrote:

It isn't supposed to require either a leap of faith or the company
remaining in business. The Company is suppose to deposit money to fund
the pension plan which is a trust with an independent board. The funds
are professionally managed and, barring catastrophe, there should be
enough to pay the promised benefits.


The problem is that the funds are typically invested in stocks and/or
bonds. If the market is doing well, the employer only has to contribute
money for relatively new employees -- employees who have been there a
while already have substantial funds, and the returns on that provide the
necessary increase. If, however, the market isn't doing well, the company
has to make continuing deposits, usually at a time in which they aren't
making very much themselves.

My former employer is typical in this regard. In early 2001, the market
was still cooking, and my former employer had the pension funds in stocks.
As the market collapsed later in the year, there was a rush to shift
everything to bonds. Then came the ENRON scandal. Congress reacted to that
by increasing the amount of equity employers had to keep in their pension
plans. That meant that companies that had pension plans suddenly had to
scrape up substantial amounts of cash to add to them at a time that the
market was forcing them to divert more and more of their income to the
plans anyway.

My company reacted in two ways. First, they laid off anyone who was close
to either a 2 year or a 5 year service anniversary (those are the dates
that pensions become partially and fully vested). That freed up a lot of
funds that could be allocated to pensions for other employees. Second,
they changed the pension plan to a "cash balance payout" plan. This works
sort of like Bush's "private account" option for Social Security. The
company pays in a certain amount into your pension. If the market does
well during your career, you'll get a big lump sum when you retire; if
not, you'll get a tiny lump sum when you retire.

George Patterson
There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the
mashed potatoes.


Companies aren't required to fund plans on a daily or even annual basis and
react to every decline in their investments. There is an assumed rate of
return and the company is required to fund the plans so that there will be
enough to pay benefits if the assumed rate of return is earned.

Mike
MU-2


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil Ewe n0 who Naval Aviation 0 April 7th 04 07:31 PM
Osama bin Laaden Big John Piloting 2 January 12th 04 04:05 AM
Big Kahunas Jay Honeck Piloting 360 December 20th 03 12:59 AM
Two Years of War Stop Spam! Military Aviation 3 October 9th 03 11:05 AM
U.S. is losing the sympathy of the world John Mullen Military Aviation 149 September 22nd 03 03:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.