A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

F-8 versus F-100



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old May 14th 05, 03:39 AM
John Carrier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Thomas Schoene" wrote in message
k.net...
Jack Doub wrote:

I believe the F-8 had the best air-to-air gun kill ratio in the SEA
war?


Probably, in the sense that there were no gun kills against the Crusader.
The F-8 overall kill ratio was 18-3, better than any type in the war. Make
that 19-3 if you count the Mig-17 that Jerry Tucker and Frank Bachman got
with no ordnance expended (awarded to the Hancock vice the fighters). A
great sea story, all the more golden because it was true.

The F-4 and F-105 both had more kills. Of course, they lost more to Migs as
well. In the case of the Thuds, the ratio was pretty much 1-1 ... not bad
considering their mission was not air-to-air and most of the engagements
were off target when they weren't enjoying something you'd call an
advantage.

OTOH, air superiority (as is more generally defined) easily went to the
Crusader air wings. The Migs stayed away. CAG-19 (VF-191 and VF-194) saw
fewer Migs (far fewer) during the entire conflict than CAG-9 (VF-192 and
VF-196) saw in one day. While multiple missions unopposed is hardly the
aggressive fighter pilot's dream, it's getting the bombers to the target
that counts. NTL, this frustration led to the Crusader motto, "A Mig at 6
is better than no Mig at all."

R / John

Not sure what this means, exactly. I'm sure it didn't have the best
guns-to-missiles kill ratio, since there were several aircraft that got
nothing but gun kills (having no AAMs). Take the F-105, for example.

The actual record for the "Last of the Gunfighters" is somewhat different
from the legend. If Barrett Tillman's _MiG Master_ is correct, only 4 of
the type's 19 MiG kills involved guns, and 3 of those were split credits
with Sidewinder or, in one case, Zuni rockets. Another 14 kills were
Sidewinder-only affairs, and one was preemptive kill (pilot bailed when he
found he was under attack).

--
Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail
"Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when
wrong to be put right." - Senator Carl Schurz, 1872






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"zero" versus "oscar" versus "sierra" Ron Garret Piloting 30 December 20th 04 08:49 AM
S-Tec System 20/30 Versus System 40/50 Marco Leon Piloting 3 November 9th 04 04:15 PM
Buying a plane versus renting RD Owning 35 March 5th 04 09:42 PM
Garmin versus Lowrance RD Piloting 15 January 2nd 04 04:32 PM
Cessna 340 Tie down versus Hangar endre Owning 11 July 17th 03 01:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.