![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But Hilton, that doesn't explain the effect observed. What DOES explain it
is the antenna pattern that the FAA chose for the VORs. In their infinite wisdom they never considered that aircraft would fly much above FL250. Remember, this was in the late 40s and early 50s that the system was designed. Therefore, they "squished" the antenna pattern to squirt more signal at a lower radiation angle than an isotropic ("all angles") radiator. Think of it as a ball of dough (isotropic) that has been squished to become a pancake (low angle radiation). If you are ABOVE the pancake, you receive less signal strength than if you are in the dough, so to speak. There are two effects here. One is "radio horizon" which limits low altitude reception to what the antenna can "see". The equation for this is that radio horizon (in miles) equals the square root of the aircraft altitude above the VOR (in feet). Thus, an aircraft near San Diego receiving SAN VORTAC (which is on an island near Pacific Beach, damn near as close to sea level as you can get) at an altitude of FL180 will have a radio horizon of 134 miles, almost exactly what the fellow said, and will be almost in the dead center of the antenna "beam" pattern. However, take that same aircraft in the same geographic spot and honk it up to FL500, the radio horizon moves to 224 miles, but you have climbed yourself way above the beam and the signal strength has dropped below usable.. Howzat? (Signal strength, BTW, falls off as the SQUARE of the distance.) Jim "Hilton" wrote in message .net... However, the FAA has depicted cylinders of various diameters stacked upon each other. Given that the VOR is line-of-sight, I did not understand why, for example, a VOR would be received 130nm out at FL180 yet only be received 100nm at FL500. Doesn't it logically follow that at the higher altitude the VOR would be able to be received further out? No, then it wouldn't fit in the semi-sphere. Signal strength drops off (non-linearly I believe) as you move away from its source, so the further you go, the weaker it becomes, hence the semi-sphere. Since the sphere tapers off at the top, so too do the cylinders. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |