![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sport Pilot wrote:
Steve wrote: Sport Pilot wrote: Diesel fuel is not conducive to high speed running. Nor is a long injection period through much of the expansion phase. Yes you can boost the turbocharger and the other things, but an Otto cycle engine will respond with even higher speeds. Parts failure from speed is not a problem with diesel engines, the rotating parts have to be bigger than an otto engine because of the higher compression, yet the otto engine will turn higer RPM's with smaller parts. All of the above is true in the common practice of diesel design, but none of it is necessarily true. There is nothing FUNDAMENTAL that limits a diesel to low-RPM designs only. One can build a screaming high-RPM diesel with light-weight rotating parts, but one would have to ask "why?" Gasoline engines are made high-revving in order to increase power output from a small package, but diesels can develop a lot more low-RPM torque through high boost because they don't detonate when "lugged," so there's no NEED to make them scream. If you need more power, don't spin them faster, just boost them harder. High RPM is an aggravation, not an advantage (no matter what Honda VTEC drivers think...). Actually diesels don't really deliver that much torque at similar speeds. Ok they do but only because the valving is timed for the slower speeds. Many gasoline tractor engines will diliver similar torque, but with a higher fuel consumption due to the lower compression ratio. It depends on what you're comparing to. A lot of tractors use normally-aspirated indirect-injection diesels, which are no comparison to a turbocharged diesel. Or to a good normally-asipirated gasoline engine, except in terms of longevity. Gasoline engines are hard to beat for the *width* of their torque curve, but modern turbo-diesels do a good job against them, and do so with better efficiency. Diesel fuel burns slower and will knock when the injection timing is shortened to allow higher speeds. Higher speed requires more than just rapid injection, it also demands higher boost pressure, which causes the fuel to burn faster without any knock-like phenomenon. All serious diesels are turbocharged for that reason (as well as others), and normally-aspirated diesels are limited to very small power outputs and relatively low efficiency. You can only get so much combustion chamber pressure through the compression ratio of the engine- the rest has to come from forced induction. As someone pointed out earlier, the VW TDI develops power up to 4500 RPM, which is comparable to many gasoline engines, but it is able to do so only because it is a turbo-diesel. As I said before, there's no reason that building a 7000-RPM diesel isn't possible, but there's no REASON to build one. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2-stroke diesel is the (near) future? | Max Kallio | Home Built | 134 | July 18th 05 12:39 AM |
BSFC vs gas mileage, 2 stroke vs 4 stroke | Jay | Home Built | 10 | August 24th 04 02:26 PM |
Diesel Jodel information..........and .........diesel plane groups | Roland M | Home Built | 1 | January 4th 04 04:04 AM |
Diesel engines for Planes Yahoo Group Jodel Diesel is Isuzu Citroen Peugeot | Roland M | Home Built | 3 | September 13th 03 12:44 AM |
Diesel engines for Planes Yahoo Group Jodel Diesel is Isuzu Citroen Peugeot | Roland M | Rotorcraft | 2 | September 13th 03 12:44 AM |