![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie wrote:
---Never, never rely on fuel gauges as to available fuel, fly by time in tanks Always take the more pessimistic view of the guages and your watch. I've had two friends put down off-field because they had higher than expected fuel burns (in one case a mechanical failure was found, in the other, I don't think he'll ever know why the fuel didn't last). My club has been putting fuel computers into our planes. It's basicly just an accurate flow meter spliced into the fuel line going to the engine. You tell it how much you started out with, and it tells you instantaneous flow rate and how much you've used (or got left). A wonderful tool. The idea that a watch and a predicted flow rate is your most accurate way of determining how much fuel you have left is absurd. The only thing that's more absurd is that GA fuel quantity gauges are so inaccurate that the watch and predicted flow rate actually is the best way, or at least was until fuel computers became available. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Alternate minimums same as forecast weather | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | February 21st 06 10:45 PM |
FBO Insurance requirement for tie-downs | Chris | Owning | 25 | May 18th 04 07:24 PM |
Alternate Intersection Name in Brackets? | Marco Leon | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | January 22nd 04 04:55 AM |
Strange wording in Commercial experience requirement | David Brooks | Piloting | 5 | January 18th 04 06:09 PM |
Alternate requirements | Anthony Chambers | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | September 17th 03 09:45 PM |