![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... That is my point. There does not appear to be any reason for anyone to ever buy a turbo norm system. The engine runs just as hot/hard, etc at altitude with a turbo norm vs. a regular turbo. The turbo norm companies try to trick people into thinking that putting a turbo norm on your engine will not wear your engine any more than normal asp because you never get over 30". However, the argument appears to be worthless, in truth a turbo norm wears out your engine just as fast as a regular turbo. -Robert I would disagree, there are a lot of reasons to buy a turbo (nomalizer or otherwise). To fly higher, fly faster, climb much faster, takeoff shorter (much shorter at high DA). Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Duo Discus Turbo - Texas, USA | Mark Zivley | Soaring | 2 | May 4th 05 11:34 PM |
turbo stc? | The Weiss Family | Owning | 21 | October 3rd 04 10:35 PM |
Turbo prop AT-6/SNJ? | frank may | Military Aviation | 11 | September 5th 04 02:51 PM |
Turbo 182: correct mixture for final approach at high altitude? | Barry Klein | Piloting | 38 | January 15th 04 03:25 AM |
A36 Bonanza turbo prop | Jeff | Owning | 46 | January 7th 04 02:37 PM |