|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
May 19th 05, 04:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... That is my point. There does not appear to be any reason for anyone to ever buy a turbo norm system. The engine runs just as hot/hard, etc at altitude with a turbo norm vs. a regular turbo. A turbo norm system simply replaces the power the engine would normally make at sea level. A regular turbo system attempts to get more power out of a smaller engine. The larger turbo normalized engine will last longer because it isn't working as hard. It will cost less in the long run to operate and be more reliable. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Duo Discus Turbo - Texas, USA | Mark Zivley | Soaring | 2 | May 4th 05 11:34 PM |
| turbo stc? | The Weiss Family | Owning | 21 | October 3rd 04 10:35 PM |
| Turbo prop AT-6/SNJ? | frank may | Military Aviation | 11 | September 5th 04 02:51 PM |
| Turbo 182: correct mixture for final approach at high altitude? | Barry Klein | Piloting | 38 | January 15th 04 03:25 AM |
| A36 Bonanza turbo prop | Jeff | Owning | 46 | January 7th 04 02:37 PM |
Threaded Mode