![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com... "Why Choose a Turbo-Normalizer Instead of a Turbo-Booster?" http://www.m-20turbos.com/choose.htm With which statement on that page do you take issue? Note that they are talking about using inter-cooling and "after-cooling" (not sure what that is). For sure, inter-cooling can do a lot to address the issue of higher operating temperatures, by counter-acting the temperature rise that occurs due to compression. Regardless, unless you are trying to say that you disagree with the entire page, providing just the link really does very little to explain to us what it is you have trouble with. I don't see anything obviously wrong with the statements made on the page (though I can't comment on some of them, such as the legalities of turbo-boosting the particular installations they are talking about for example). Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Duo Discus Turbo - Texas, USA | Mark Zivley | Soaring | 2 | May 4th 05 11:34 PM |
turbo stc? | The Weiss Family | Owning | 21 | October 3rd 04 10:35 PM |
Turbo prop AT-6/SNJ? | frank may | Military Aviation | 11 | September 5th 04 02:51 PM |
Turbo 182: correct mixture for final approach at high altitude? | Barry Klein | Piloting | 38 | January 15th 04 03:25 AM |
A36 Bonanza turbo prop | Jeff | Owning | 46 | January 7th 04 02:37 PM |